Search My Site!
Archives
- November 2016 (1)
- November 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (4)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (5)
- March 2015 (5)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (1)
- July 2014 (7)
- June 2014 (5)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (10)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (7)
- January 2014 (9)
- December 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (4)
- July 2013 (1)
- June 2013 (2)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (11)
- March 2013 (13)
- February 2013 (3)
- January 2013 (9)
- December 2012 (5)
- November 2012 (17)
- October 2012 (10)
- September 2012 (20)
- August 2012 (20)
- July 2012 (14)
- June 2012 (17)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (9)
- March 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (5)
- August 2011 (2)
- July 2011 (12)
- June 2011 (17)
- May 2011 (23)
- April 2011 (32)
- March 2011 (8)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (1)
- July 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (5)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (8)
- March 2009 (7)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (7)
- December 2008 (9)
- November 2008 (11)
- October 2008 (18)
- September 2008 (13)
- August 2008 (3)
- July 2008 (6)
- June 2008 (4)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (3)
- March 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (2)
- December 2007 (2)
- November 2007 (2)
- October 2007 (1)
- September 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (5)
- July 2007 (3)
- June 2007 (2)
- May 2007 (1)
- April 2007 (2)
- March 2007 (1)
- February 2007 (1)
- January 2007 (3)
- December 2006 (3)
- November 2006 (12)
- October 2006 (5)
- September 2006 (5)
- August 2006 (3)
- July 2006 (4)
- June 2006 (5)
- May 2006 (7)
- April 2006 (5)
- March 2006 (4)
- February 2006 (10)
- January 2006 (1)
Fun Stuff
Interesting Reading
Lawyers and Law Blogs
Security and Warfare
Monthly Archives: September 2008
no, thank YOU
This being a road movie, the primary entertainment is in watching our heroes encounter the better and worse sort of locals, and this film doesn’t disappoint. From a bar fight provoked by vacuous, bitchy college girls to a great cameo by John Heard as a cocktail party blowhard, from the traditional running-away-while-zipping-up-one’s-pants fiasco to a totally gratuitous tornado, this movie doesn’t disappoint. It’s not as flat-out wacky as National Lampoon’s Vacation, of course, but — here’s the interesting thing — it manages to explore exactly the same issues around the Iraq War and the cost that soldiers are shouldering as Kimberly Peirce’s Stop-Loss, with about a tenth as much melodrama.
Posted in filmmaking, soldiering
Leave a comment
jelly baby?
I like Eccleston partly because his name reminds me of Eccles from The Goon Show, but mostly because he understands that what made the old series so exciting was that every actor who played the Doctor (at least during my years of fandom — Tom Baker through Sylvester McCoy) took the sometimes ludicrous SF content seriously and threw himself into every situation with absolute commitment.
Posted in filmmaking
Leave a comment
you kidnapped my guitar
I’d watched the first episode of the fourth season of House, M.D. before, but watching it again I’m impressed by the brilliant simplicity of its medical plotline. I’ve always been afraid to try writing a spec episode for House because … Continue reading
Posted in adventure, California, filmmaking
Leave a comment
seriously?
Holy shit. All right, so I was reading here about Timur Bekmambetov’s new, improved (?!) Moby-Dick, and in one of the comments there was a peculiar link to the WB’s website with a picture of Lauren Graham and the tagline — my jaw dropped — “MILF and cookies.”
And it’s not just used in an advertising link — it’s the official slogan of the WB’s new webcast of full episodes here!
Does Lauren Graham know about this?
Posted in advertising, filmmaking, tasteless, women
Leave a comment
witch just goes to show….
But whether it was God or some clever ancient lawmaker who first outlawed witchcraft, there are surely very good reasons for it — reasons that ought to appeal to the stoutest and most scientific skeptic. Namely, witchcraft is fraud, pure and simple. Witchcraft was to the ancient world what astrology, homeopathy, “energy work,” Scientology, and the Atkins diet are to our own era — a dishonest attempt to use confirmation bias and other psychological effects to convince people that they can have something for nothing, that the world doesn’t work the way it appears to, that there’s a “secret knowledge” that’s available only through initiated practitioners and that can enable one to step around the rules that apply to everyone else.
typing by ear
Here’s something I noticed today: I type aurally. That is, I type like someone transcribing for closed-captioned television; I type what I hear in my head. There’s a narrator (me, presumably), and my hands type, usually by muscle memory, whatever … Continue reading
Posted in linguistics
Leave a comment
numbers don’t lie, but they’re not always good at explaining why grandma has to live with us
But I.O.U.S.A isn’t just concerned about today’s debts. As becomes clear towards the end, the real killer isn’t what we owe now; that’s salt peanuts compared to what we will owe in the next forty years or so as the population ages and we’re forced to spend more and more on pensions, medical care, and prescription drugs. Here’s where I sat up in the theater, gooseflesh all over. Because today’s total national debt is already more than half our GDP, and this film’s projections, if they’re in any way remotely accurate, predict a national debt in the coming decades that will actually completely dwarf our GDP, many times over. Remember when you were a kid, and they had those diagrams — “How many Earths could fit in side the Sun?” This is like that. And when that happens, we will literally have no more money left for anything but paying Social Security and the national debt. No national defense. The fucking Canadians will just come across the border and make us all wear flannel and replace our table sugar with maple syrup. Jesus.
Posted in economics, filmmaking
1 Comment
my people have no TP
Beavis and Butthead is often seen as a precursor to South Park, a show that generally provokes a mixture of sympathy and exasperation in me — exasperation primarily because it’s so goddamned on the nose with its satire of topical political issues and celebrity quirks. (“Tom Cruise won’t come out of the closet! Just come out of the closet, Mr. Cruise!”) B&B, on the other hand, isn’t usually about anyone recognizable at all, apart from a very generic Rush Limbaugh parody in “Right On.” Usually it’s just about these two sad fools, trying to squeeze something that doesn’t suck out of life. There’s rarely any fantasy or adventure in their lives — they’re too old for make-believe, unlike the South Park gang, and the show’s writers don’t allow things like a giant, out-of-control Barbra Streisand to come rampaging through the duo’s crappy Texas town. When there’s nothing on TV, there’s just nothing at all. And while in South Park the adults may be self-centered, thick, and sexually deviant, in B&B they’re flatly cruel. When Buzzcut and McVicker fake a fire alarm and lock the boys out of the school in just their underwear (“Wet Behind The Rears”), a line is horribly crossed — but of course, these boys’ absent parents will never file a complaint.
Posted in filmmaking
Leave a comment
i live here!
I’ve settled in Venice. My Flickr page has more, but here are a few pics of my gardeny new abode.
Posted in California
Leave a comment